London Olympics 2012 Conspiracy

The media psy-ops have begun. The signs are that there would be a security crisis in the Olympics and the blame would come upon Pakistan. To gain the support of the entire world, people of the “entire” world must die and no place can be better venue for such a flase flag than Olympics. The Olympics are in 27 July to 12 August 2012. That is just 3 months way and we have NO government in Islamabad.

With the levels of anarchy and chaos in Islamabad, the government would crash and crumble under threat of an international “coalition” war, deployment of Af-Pak and Cold start. With the levels of anarchy in Pakistan already and demands for elections in those times would mean a total and complete meltdown of Pakistani state under such a  threat.

 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A frontier far away holds the key to our Olympics security

Instead of a military lock-down in London, politicians should focus energies on Islamabad. 

Security: the Rapier missiles will form a protective shield over London during the Olympics

By Con Coughlin

There are now just 80 days to go before the start of the Great Siege of London, when the daily routines of millions of the capital’s citizens are to be subjected to military diktat. Forget the excitement of the sporting performances at the London 2012 Olympics. The Government’s decision to stage the biggest-ever peacetime display of the nation’s military firepower is set to rival anything the world’s leading athletes can offer at the various Olympic venues.

In scenes reminiscent of the Blitz, a new generation of heavily armed Typhoon interceptors and anti-aircraft missile batteries will be stationed among the city’s residential districts ready to shoot down any rogue plane at a moment’s notice.

The majestic reaches of the River Thames will provide temporary shelter for the Royal Navy’s largest warship, HMS Ocean, where teams of Royal Marines will be on 24-hour standby to deal with a terrorist attack. And in the city itself highly trained Special Forces units will mingle with the crowds on the look-out for suspicious characters. Heaven help the playful parent who uses a water pistol to cool down their over-excitable children in the summer heat.

If nothing else, long after it has been removed from office, the Coalition will be remembered for its one great triumph: turning a peaceful sporting event into a major war zone. The Olympic motto, Citius, altius, fortius – faster, higher, stronger – certainly seems more appropriate to the firepower displayed by our Armed Forces than the attributes of the competitors.

I doubt many Londoners would have voted in favour of their city hosting the 2012 Olympics if they’d been forewarned of the disruption it would inflict on their lives. But then, very few Londoners were consulted when, in 2005, Tony Blair took it upon himself to win the Olympic bid to show that, in spite of the unpopularity of the Iraq war, he still possessed that winning touch.

Related Articles

• Al-Qaeda video shows US hostage pleading for his life
  07 May 2012
• 9-11 attacks suspects to be formally charged
  05 May 2012
• Bomb kills 16 in Pakistan
  04 May 2012
• Obama welcomes thawing of US-Pakistan relations
  27 Mar 2012

And I also question whether the Government’s over-the-top security measures will succeed in discouraging
al-Qaeda terrorists – who are still desperate to avenge last year’s killing of Osama bin Laden – from carrying out their schemes.
As a general rule, if Islamist terrorists are determined to perpetrate an atrocity, they most likely will. Those responsible for the September 11 attacks had several failed attempts to use multiple airliners in a spectacular attack before they succeeded in inflicting carnage on America’s eastern seaboard. The names of our own home-grown July 7 suicide bombers were actually logged in some obscure recess of the national police computer system under “pending”, but that did not prevent them from attacking London’s transport system that dreadful summer’s morning.

Such considerations, though, have not stopped the Government from assembling a 19,000-strong military force to ensure the event enjoys the best possible protection. I am sure I am not the only one to note that the total number of soldiers, sailors and airmen who will be on duty is twice the size of the British force currently deployed to southern Afghanistan, where British forces are engaged in fighting a real war, rather than an imaginary one.
For a Government that has shown little interest in military issues, inflicting cuts on all three Services during its ill-informed 2010 Defence Review, its enthusiasm for placing the nation’s capital under military occupation shows a worrying confusion over where our true national priorities lie.
By all means beef up the policing and other security arrangements that normally apply when we host a major sporting event. But if the politicians really want to stop Islamist terrorists from attacking high-profile fixtures, they would be far better advised to concentrate their energies on addressing the root cause of the problem – the lawless border territory between Pakistan and Afghanistan, where most of the plots are hatched in the first place.

Next week, a major Nato conference is being held in Chicago to determine the future of the West’s commitment to Afghanistan once the bulk of American and British forces is withdrawn by the end of 2014. As with London and the Olympics, Chicago is going to be subjected to a similar security lock-down as delegates from more than 50 countries deliberate over Afghanistan’s fate. Yesterday the conference website posted the cheery news about the extensive road closures that will be imposed throughout the city for the weekend-long Nato jolly, which is being billed as “Chicago 2012: the Global Crossroads”.
The conference’s primary aim is to persuade donor nations to contribute about $4 billion to sustain Afghanistan’s reconstruction effort after more than three decades of incessant conflict. This is a mere fraction of the tens of billions that have been spent on this benighted country since Western forces piled in following the September 11 attacks. And yet no one seems prepared to cough up what is, by comparison, a relatively modest sum. Which explains why our involvement in Afghanistan really is at the crossroads.

Britain, currently spending about £3 billion a year on the country, has said it will contribute $100 million (£60 million), allowing the Government to pocket the rest of its “peace dividend” from our troops’ withdrawal. But other countries, such as France, are reluctant to make even this modest contribution, an attitude likely to intensify following the election of the socialist and anti-war candidate François Hollande as the country’s new president.

The reluctance of those who will be attending the Chicago summit to commit to the long-term stability and security of Afghanistan is symptomatic of the mood of war fatigue that has overcome all the major Western powers, which was best summed up by President Barack Obama’s whistle-stop visit last week.

It was fitting that Mr Obama should launch his campaign for re-election with a photo opportunity in Kabul. The Afghan conflict has, after all, been dubbed “Obama’s War”, in contrast to the previous Bush administration’s obsession with Iraq. But the fact that Mr Obama stole into Kabul like a thief in the night and declared his intention to end America’s decade-long war against militant Islam before heading back to the US sent out the wrong signals. If all Mr Obama wants to talk about is when America brings home the troops, then there is little prospect of Nato achieving its most elusive strategic goal – forcing the Taliban to the negotiating table.

Moreover, it is pointless for Mr Obama or any other Western leader to make high-profile visits to Afghanistan while relations with Pakistan, its influential neighbour, remain in cold storage. Unless there is a radical change in Islamabad’s position, one of the notable absentees from Chicago will be Pakistan, a country that arguably has more influence over the Taliban than any other, particularly as most Taliban commanders take their orders directly from Pakistan’s ISI intelligence agency.

Rather than indulging in meaningless photo-ops in Kabul, American – and British – leaders would make more profitable use of their time trying to repair the disastrous breakdown in relations with Islamabad following the “kill raid” on Osama bin Laden by a team of US Navy Seals.

The key to better Olympics security lies on the Afghan-Pakistan frontier, not the newly constructed sporting arenas of the East End. If only our politicians could grasp this rather basic fact then perhaps we might all be spared the costly and unnecessary military pageant they are planning for this summer’s Olympic Games.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/pakistan/9250307/A-frontier-far-away-holds-the-key-to-our-Olympics-security.htm